On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:24:52PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 12:34 PM 15/09/2003, Daniel Senie wrote:
> >At 11:50 AM 9/15/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >>I know this is the qppopper list, but can anyone from qualcomm comment on
> >>the security issues for Eudora ? I find it rather distressing that
> >>several known holes would be seemingly left unaddressed for so
> >>long. Perhaps the qualcomm people here can respond on bugtraq where the
> >>posting below was made.
> >
> >This really isn't the right list. I'm getting the distinct impression ...
>
> I realize that, but I am getting concerned that after a year of no response
> on bugtraq or full disclosure the Eudora engineers are ???? I dont know,
> dont care ? Are not given the resources to care ? Dont understand ? It
> would be nice if they said something.
As far as I know, Randy Gellens is the *only* person from Qualcomm on
this list, and I suspect he has to struggle just to get enough free
time to work on qpopper. It's enough work trying to get qpopper
security updates released. It doesn't make sense to try to make him
responsible for Eudora as well; I don't even know if he works on
Eudora.
Conventional channels may not be working to reach the Eudora
engineers, but I doubt this one will work any better - they're just not
going to see it. The only audience you're reaching is other qpopper
users.
You could try the time-honored approach of registering the domain
"eudorasucks.com", putting some content there, and waiting for Qualcomm
corporate management to hear about it and flip out. Apart from that, I
have no suggestions for what would work.
-- Clifton
--
Clifton Royston -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tiki Technologies Lead Programmer/Software Architect
Did you ever fly a kite in bed? Did you ever walk with ten cats on your head?
Did you ever milk this kind of cow? Well we can do it. We know how.
If you never did, you should. These things are fun, and fun is good.
-- Dr. Seuss
