On Aug 31, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
For what it's worth I really don't like this implementation - if
we're going to add in a connection id it should be identical to the
transaction id, but with a counter added. Currently this will give
a different "host" part to the transaction id, which just seems
wrong to me.
+1.
Why not move all the id logic to the connection object and have the
transaction id just be connection->id + counter ?
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
