Why would spamd be faster with PPerl?
Sorry, I was misremembering something that Matt Sergeant told me once. He said to run spamassassin itself under PPerl (and not spamc/spamd) since PPerl will make it into a much more efficient daemon than spamc/spamd could do.
Yeah, but I was wrong because of the way SA loads rules the pperl version will be slower (by quite a bit).
