On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2004, at 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Are there any moves afoot to do the same thing for qmail-remote as
> > qpsmtpd does for qmail-smtpd?
>
> IIRC Russ Nelson has a perl mail sender somewhere in his software
> archive. Might be a good starting point. Though qmail-remote is quite
> advanced in its capabilities, and so I'd be wary of trying to port it
> to perl.
>
> Can't your local users just go through qpsmtpd?
Local users not on the mail server are going through qpsmtpd now.
However, there are those (including me) who have accounts directly on the
server, whose email is injected directly into the queue without the
benefit of screening by qpsmtpd. If I were to implement webmail, I imagine
that would be the case, also. I suppose both local (on the server) users
and webmail users could be configured to use the server as a remote relay
or smarthost, connecting from localhost, and that would ensure qpsmtpd
checking.
--
Roger Walker
"HIS Pain - OUR Gain"
