On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Mark Powell wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > > > This was a bug in CVS, now fixed. Why are you trying to use a CVS > > > > version on a live system? It's not considered stable yet. Use 0.28. > > > > > > Isn't all this, because Brian Grossman suggested the following patch on > > > 25/11/03, which after discussion, Matt, you agreed with the next day. > > > However, in 0.28 (released on 5/6/04) this patch had still not made it in? > > > > No, it's because of other bugs we've introduced since then :-) > > > > We've now dumped Mail::Address in favour of Qpsmtpd::Address because of > > this issue that you patched, which we can fully control and is written > > specifically for SMTP addresses. > > But you said, use 0.28 not CVS. Make your mind up :) > He hit the bug in 0.28 so went to CVS to see if the recent > Qpsmtpd::Address were a work-around. He hit a bug there, so now has to use > qmail-smtpd! > Maybe we should have a 0.28.1 with this bug fixed?
Actually I think maybe we should push out 0.29. There are some nice changes since 0.28. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->get a SMart net</:-> I am Jack's broken heart.
