> >> I can pull head, port, test and diff > >> it sooner than later if there's any interest. I know some use > >> multilog, but > >> I've been running with stdout piped to logger until I patched for it. > > > > This wouldn't be a bad thing to have. > > How about logging going through the plugin mechanism? I'd *much* > rather see that than having to custom hack each new logging mechanism > in.
I think plugins are a little too heavy for this. Log::Dispatch is tailor made for this. (Which I'd prefer to see used instead of hacking syslog support in.) -R
