On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:15:55 -0500, John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The more I think about it, the more I like David's "Simple Junk Mail > Declaration Protocol" proposal, since this would allow the classifier to > specify exactly how it would like messages to be presented for > reclassification. thanks -- I worry that I am a troll on the qpsmtpd list -- there is a chicken-and-egg problem about having a standard for MUA implementors to write to. The IETF subcommittee on filtering headers floundered around about a more general tagging mechanism rather than SJMDP, and SJMDP had been stalled until the general tagging mechanism was nailed down in order to be compliant with it. I might rewrite it and submit it directly to the RFC queue, when I do so it will include an IMAP reporting mechanism in addition to HTTP(s) and mailto. -- David L Nicol Communication is neither obvious nor inscrutable.
