On Sunday 20 Feb 2005 23:53, Devin Carraway wrote: > Not crazy about the bang as an errorcode selector, though. If a line in > badrcptto is doing to trigger a DENYHARD, it may as well say DENYHARD (or > DENY or DISCONNECT or whatever) and eliminate the uncertainty.
I agree, but as an extra field I'd suggest something that can't be mis-spelt and remains simply extensible. And I prefer putting an indicator of intention rather than something like the name of the behaviour - normally I'd put this at the start of the line (as Robert notes) but I thought it best to keep the file backward compatible. Cheers -- Tim
