On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Bob wrote:
...Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Bob wrote:
...
How would sslserver compare?
sslserver (http://www.superscript.com/ucspi-ssl/sslserver.html) is a problem for anyone who wishes to distribute binaries, as its source code doesn't come with any license. The provenance of the source code isn't clear either, although clearly much of it comes from djb.
There's a license or debian and bsd wouldn't touch it. I suggest reading what debian and bsd say about ucspi-tcp, daemontools,
Reading about ucspi-tcp and daemontools will not tell me what the license for (all of) ucspi-ssl is.
what the license is.
If you know of a license for ucspi-ssl could you please point me to it?
djb hasn't carped at debian or Felix Leitner or the ldapdns guy or bsd.
While that is true, it is no guarantee for the future (which is why we have explicit licenses).
bsd says "license indistinct" for one thing.
About ucspi-ssl? And if so, doesn't that confirm my point?
--- Charlie
