David Nicol wrote:
> On 5/10/05, Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>I'm currently trying to hack TLS support for qpsmtpd. The idea is to use
>>IO::Socket::TLS. I implemented a new starttls command, my current code is:
> 
> why not use an stunnel proxy?

I, for one, being an enthusiastic qpsmtpd user, would much rather use a
TLS enabled version of qpsmtpd than setup an stunnel proxy.  Here's why:

1) I don't have to read through the stunnel docs and worry if I'm
setting it up correctly, and correspondingly deal with additional
libraries I have to configure/upgrade/maintain.

2) Although I've read an stunnel-qmail howto at
http://www.suspectclass.com/~sgifford/stunnel-tlsproxy/smtp-tls.README ,
I'd much rather have something integrated into qpsmtpd that Just Works.

3) I'm enough of a hacker that I could get the stunnel proxy setup, but
I've already got a fair amount of hackery in my existing setup with
qpsmtpd/vpopmail/qmail/yadayada, and not having to setup Yet Another
Service is a big sigh of relief.

Some of these reasons may not make sense from a technical standpoint.
But I know qpsmtpd, I'm comfortable with it, and I have enough going on
that built in TLS support is something that sounds very appealing to me.

- Fred

Reply via email to