Matt Sergeant wrote:
And I'd much rather we could do this via the plugin API (same as I would for auth, but that's another argument :-)
Hey, no fair using Robert's plugin API change (which I didn't have when I finished implementing AUTH) to diss the AUTH support. ;-)
One thing to point out is that there can be at most a single TLS provider possible, whereas there can be multiple AUTH providers. Are you thinking that there would be an auth plugin that other plugins could plugin to? It still seems easier to support the AUTH keyword in the core and only plugin the methods.
Though I have to say I like how you extended the keywords! John
