On 8 Jul 2005, at 11:42, Charlie Brady wrote:
Nice approach indeed. Looks good, but I can see at least one problem (not insurmountable) - STARTTLS should be removed from capabilities after TLS is negotiated.
Isn't that done by reset_transaction?
On 8 Jul 2005, at 11:42, Charlie Brady wrote:
Nice approach indeed. Looks good, but I can see at least one problem (not insurmountable) - STARTTLS should be removed from capabilities after TLS is negotiated.
Isn't that done by reset_transaction?