Re: About smtpgreeting

[Gordon Rowell]

John Peacock wrote:
[...]
That's easy enough to add.  However, I've attached a slight rewrite to 
Guillaume's patch so that now it handles multiline config files properly 
and has all of the default values in a hash (which makes it very easy to 
eventually abstract out completely as a language file).  I'm not 
emotionally invested in one or the other (I just felt intellectually 
challenged to pursue the more complicated patch ;-) so I'm willing to 
commit either one.

I prefer the more complete solution and the ability to provide L10N of 
all strings.

Go for it, IMO.

Gordon