On 2005-08-23 14:16:08 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > >I just updated my RPMs[0] to this version and deployed them on my private > >mail server.
And its running on our primary MX since sunday. So far nobody has complained ... > >[0] At the usual place: <http://www.hjp.at/apt/redhat/7.3/i386/RPMS.hjp> > > resp. <http://www.hjp.at/apt/redhat/7.3/i386/SRPMS.hjp>. I can > > rebuild them for other Redhat/Fedora releases if somebody is > > interested. > > I'm certainly interested in RPMs for RHEL4/CentOS4, You are in luck: We set up our first RHEL4 server yesterday :-). > and I'd be happier to use canonical versions than home built ones. I'm trying to keep the patches to the minimum, and I'm still hoping that 3 of the patches will make it into 0.31-final. > Is it impractical to build your RPMs so that they are version agnostic? > Installing the modules directly into /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl would work > for all supported versions, would it not? I think this should work, or at least reduce the number of required versions (dependencies may still be different). I'll look into it. hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | All programmers are optimists. |_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Frederick Brooks, Jr., __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | The Mythical Man Month
pgp9GaAbCeg2p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
