> > +1 > > I suppose that means you expect me to do it? ;-) Exactly.
> Would it be better to make config() respect =cut instead so we can > include POD that can be used as is? That seems like an unnecessary complication of the config format. -R
> > +1 > > I suppose that means you expect me to do it? ;-) Exactly.
> Would it be better to make config() respect =cut instead so we can > include POD that can be used as is? That seems like an unnecessary complication of the config format. -R