Robin Bowes wrote: > I was expecting to get little or no output in the detailed log for a > message that was delivered successfully.
No, the detailed log is exactly like running the standard logging with LOGDEBUG. My initial attempt at this collected up log lines and only output them when the message was ACCEPTED or REJECTED. The problem with this was that the log lines would not be spooled at all if the remote server hung for a while, the log lines would not get timestamps contemporaneous from when they were actually generated, and there is the added memory to spool these lines. The way I am using this, I have detailed logs going back no more than a day and accepted logs going back two weeks. I typically find that if there is a problem, I find out right away (and can check the detailed logs), but I sometimes need to demonstrate that something went out OK last week. So I am covered both ways... HTH John
