Matt Sergeant said the following on 10/01/2006 15:55:
> On 10 Jan 2006, at 10:42, Robin Bowes wrote:
>
>>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>>
>> Got it.
>>
>> Several things really...
>>
>> 1. Use $validrcptto not %validrcptto
>> 2. Don't specify the .cdb extension (can someone confirm how this works?
>> Does the code take the filename and append ".cdb" ?
>
>
> Yes. It's a bit strange, and really screws with caching unfortunately. I
> wish we could just re-write it all - there have been a number of
> suggestions to do so.
>
>> 3. (and this is the main problem) The config object is under $self->qp,
>> e.g.:
>>
>> # map to cdb file containing valid local email addresses
>> my $validrcptto = $self->qp->config( 'validrcptto', 'map' )
>> || return DECLINED;
>
>
> Ah, I adding a proxy to allow $self->config() in trunk, hence why I
> wrote what I wrote.
Ah, I see.
Anyway, it's still not working.
I've just had loads of mail bounce because I thought it was - the joys
of testing in a live environment!
Here's what I'm currently using:
# map to cdb file containing valid local email addresses
my $validrcptto = $self->qp->config( 'validrcptto', 'map' )
|| return DECLINED;
# build addresses to check:
my $host = '@' . lc( $recipient->host );
my ($user) = split $SEPARATOR, $recipient->user;
my $to = lc($user) . $host;
warn "$to not found in validrcptto"
if (! exists $validrcptto->{$to} );
warn "$host not found in validrcptto"
if (! exists $validrcptto->{$host} );
This produces the following in the log file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] not found in validrcptto at
./plugins/check_validrcptto_cdb line 54, <STDIN> line 173.
@robinbowes.com not found in validrcptto at
./plugins/check_validrcptto_cdb line 56, <STDIN> line 173.
I've added a "warn Dumper $validrcptto" which produces the following in
the log:
2006-01-10 16:34:11.612815500 $VAR1 = {};
So, it looks like the cdb is not getting read.
This is the cdb file in th config dir:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4013 Jan 10 16:23 validrcptto.cdb
Any ideas?
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
If a man speaks in a forest,
and his wife's not there,
is he still wrong?
