John Peacock wrote:
> How about we split change Qpsmtpd::DSN so that any one plugin must load
> it, but the methods are added to the Qpsmtpd::Plugin class, rather than
> the Qpsmtpd::DSN class?  That way, the lean mean spam-eating machine
> doesn't need to load it ever, but the ordinary slow and steady MTA gets
> the methods in easy to call ways.  A true helper class.

I never got any feedback on my counter-proposal, so I committed to branches/0.3x
what Hanno originally sent to the list with minor tweaks.

John

Reply via email to