Matt Sergeant wrote: > On 2-Apr-06, at 1:13 AM, John Wang wrote: > >> Also, are there any known problems with Apache::Qpsmtpd aside from not >> >>> working with check_earlytalker. I've read that apache.org uses >>> Apache::Qpsmtpd so I assume it's reasonably stable. Is this true? >>> >> >> The post also indicates that Apache::Qpsmtpd won't be materially >> faster than >> forkserver. If so, what's the primary motivation to use >> Apache::Qpsmtpd if >> it won't work with check_earlytalker. > > > a) it does work with check_earlytalker - if you find it doesn't please > file a bug report. > > b) it should be significantly faster since there is no fork overhead > with Apache. > > c) there are other "management" advantages such as the Apache scoreboard.
This sounds interesting. I've not considered Apache::Qpsmtpd before - is there a HowTo anywhere describing how to set it up? R.
