Was there a reason the loadcheck plug-in (March 2006) didn't get included in 0.32? What are the requirements for predicting what plug-ins are in a rollup?
I recall my logging plug-in patch never got reviewed (Nov 2004). I'm happy to see it in current code -- I even see comments in the current code akin to issues that I had. It's cute and I'm mostly over it. I've run with my own branch of 0.28 with logging as a plug-in and such for about two years and I'm not really sure why I came back to the current. In other projects submitted patches typically a thumbs-up/down response with some reasonable critique. Granted I don't generate a large number of submissions, but I wonder how many other bits of goodness have also been passively overlooked in this project. I've been down this rant road before (last Jan) and with what I put up last night I'm wondering what to expect this time around. Am I not following the expected convention of participation? Thanks and sorry for the noise. peter
