On 2006-11-05 13:09:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Peter J. Holzer writes: > > >Something else I forgot? > > Yeah, that people won't bother doing either of that. =/
Yes, that's problem with all polls.
> Start with creating a single page listing _all_ plugins;
That assumes that I know all of them. The most complete list I know of
is the one in the wiki.
> their name, a short description and an URL to where they can be found,
These are already on the wiki. Hence my first idea was to let people
vote there.
> the date it was added and then a button people can press to indicate
> if they think it's a good plugin or not. That data would then be
> presented at least in two different formats, a) the number of people
> that's clicked it and b) the number of people that's clicked it
> compensated for the total time it's been available on that page.
Personally I think its much less work to mail a file to some address
(especially if there is a script to do it) than to go through a long
list of plugins and decide for each one whether it is good or not (which
btw is a different question that whether I use it or not).
> That page could also get a second section, where developers can list the
> projects/plugins that they're considering to start, so that people can pick
> what plugins should be created first; and it'd allow any developer to pick
> up any wanted project not started yet.
Personally, I implement what I need. But if any qpsmtpd developer is
feeling bored and looking for ideas to implement, such a page might be
useful. But since its mainly a source of ideas I think a wiki page
"ideas for new plugins" would be sufficient.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Schlagfertigkeit ist das, was einem
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | auf dem Nachhauseweg einfällt.
| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Lars 'Cebewee' Noschinski in dasr.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
