Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"tony" == tony  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

tony> Closing down the mailserver at the A-site and relying only on the
tony> MX-server gave me some weird (in the "I'm feeling all alone now that I
tony> don't get any spam"-way) results; and I can't really explain the results
tony> as I don't have enough data to say anything for sure, and instead of
tony> spending a cpl of weeks collecting enough data from the few servers that
tony> I can play around with as I please (without possibly upseting anyone) I
tony> thought I'd ask you all... What are spammers mostly targeting nowadays;
tony> do they ignore MXs, do they target MXs based on priority and do they
tony> probe the different options (As and all MXs) to find what works best?

stonehenge.com has *never* had an A record, and yet I certainly get
my share of spam.

My "high MX trap" trips up about half of the incoming spam, however.
So they certainly are looking at MX values.
But apparently not at the actually name (spamtrap)
nice.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F  6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F

I never had a dream come true
'Til the day that I found you.
Even though I pretend that I've moved on
You'll always be my baby.
I never found the words to say
You're the one I think about each day
And I know no matter where life takes me to
A part of me will always be...
A part of me will always be with you.

Reply via email to