I don't have an issue with depending on non-broken versions of modules
in the core.

I know that's suboptimal for distro maintainers, but we have to draw a
line somewhere.

Thanks for submitting the bug report.

-R

At Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:57:19 +0100,
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
> On 2006-12-16 08:22:28 -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> > On Dec 16, 2006, at 2:39 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > 
> > >I'll be the first to admit that it is an ugly hack. I don't like it,
> > >either. However, we need something which works with current (and even
> > >old) versions of Net::DNS, not with some future version where the  
> > >bug is
> > >fixed.
> > 
> > If we can get the Net::DNS maintainer to release a newer one, how  
> > about just requiring that?
> 
> Fine for the source distribution of qpsmtpd. As the maintainer of the
> RPMs, I'd probably still have to include the kludge, or provide RPMs of
> the newer Net::DNS. I suspect Gavin would have to do the same for his
> Debian package. 
> 
>       hp
> 
> PS: I've gone ahead and submitted a bug report on Net::DNS:
> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=23961
> 
> -- 
>    _  | Peter J. Holzer    | I know I'd be respectful of a pirate 
> |_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | with an emu on his shoulder.
> | |   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]         |
> __/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |  -- Sam in "Freefall"
> [2 Digital signature <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>]
> 

Reply via email to