On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:57:54 +1100
Gavin Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 09:51:27PM -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
> > i have been running qpsmtpd for a little while now, and love it. but,
> > i am getting questions from users about missing email. no one is
> > actually able to point at any specific problem, they are just jumpy
> > now that there is no spam :) but since i use check_earlytalker and
> > other plugins that drop before rcpt_to, i dont have a good log to show
> > to prove it.
> > 
> > so- my idea is to modify all the plugins i use to add notes to the
> > transaction instead of deny. then a final plugin will hook_data, and
> > check those notes. early talkers will still get dropped, but
> > not until i have the entire envelope. it's kinda like SA's spam score,
> > but before the data is transmitted. its also basically how
> > check_verybadrcptto works...
> > 
> > what am i missing here? have not been using qpsmtpd long enough to see
> > all the problems.
> 
> I believe there are issues with some MTAs not liking getting 
> denied on DATA, but that's about the only problem I can see here.

So sadly true :(.  However, you should be able to reject a lot
at rcpt-to time.

If you have different weights per user for your various spam tests, you
might send a 4xy code for each recipient after the first one you accept,
perhaps excepting the ones you give a 5xx to.  If you're not careful
though, that could interfere with greylisting.

Brian

Reply via email to