On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:17 +0100, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > The problem is that almost no-one has access (which you did explain to > > me in response to my code.google tracker) so the wiki is being used as a > > source code repository.
This is the only problem that I see. > > I've have several times offered to act as a "human gateway" to the > contrib directory. That is, I will add a subdirectory below contrib for > anyone who asks and check in and update plugins people send to me. > So far nobody has taken me up on that offer. I will when/if I get there ... but I'm being much slower than I anticipated ... > > (Yes, a repository where everybody could have write access to their own > subtree would be better - but as long as there are only two people who > have contributed anything (and at least one of them (me) has commit Ok. > rights anyway) I can understand that the repository owners don't want to > invest work into the svn infrastructure.) Ask says he has given svn access to anyone who has asked so I don't see any problem here. I suppose I will request access if and when I require it. Until then I will just send things your way. When I get back to looking at the wiki, I suppose I could copy plugin code, test it, track down the originator and send it to you to be put in the appropriate place. As long as that works, I can then replace the wiki text with a pointer to the svn repo. Unless someone complains ... -- --gh
