On 28-Jun-07, at 5:44 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 13:19, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Using gearman, that's how.
Didn't we talk about this before? Maybe just in my head.
Yep.
We should have a generic "gearman plugin" configured something like
"gearman real_plugin" and then a "gearman worker" that reads config/
gearman_plugins (or just scans config/plugins for uses of the
gearman plugin). If we could get that to work then it'd Just Work.
That's a bit more complicated because you can't assume that the
worker has access to the Qpsmtpd objects. It's a one-way
communication really (modulo the response).
Plus the workers aren't necessarily on the same box as the qpsmtpd-
async instance so might not be able to read config/*
Matt.
