On Tuesday 23. March 2010 17:36:50 Michael Papet wrote: > That's the point. It catches mail that somehow makes it through the > bayesian classification systems as uncertain. I'm not trying to beat > spamassassin. I'm trying to address the weaknesses. >
That sounds good, but given Steve's criticism, and that you would have to wait for DATA anyway, I can't see any advantage of using it in QPSMTPD, it seems to be much better suited as a SpamAssassin plugin. Googling, I find some traces of it being worked on for SA, see e.g. http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@spamassassin.apache.org/msg29261.html but I can't find it in the latest release. I think it might better to spend the time getting that plugin into shape. Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
