On Thursday 10 March 2011 18:06:04 Robert Spier wrote: > Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs? > > > > I like that idea. > > I'm not sure I do. The existing directories don't really line up that > way, and I don't think we're going to have a huge number of > postfix/qmail split plugins. So I see this more as a suffix. > > I wouldn't mind moving these into some sort of directory (maybe rcpt?) > but moving plugins is hard, because everyone needs to update their > config/plugins file.
Are you just talking about the plugins config file understanding names as paths rather than as simply filenames (and presumably config files mirroring the same structure) - I would see this as a good thing (I can put my specific plugins into local/ or similar, and symlinks can be used if I want to be fancy) ? I presume you could leave all existing plugins in the "root" but suggest migrating them over time... Or does this as a change go deeper than that (I've always disliked that the config file of plugins is itself mixed in the same folder with all the plugin configs, but figured I was just being picky) ? I'm a long way out of date with current developments, sorry, you shouldn't have all made the early versions so .. erm... functional and complete :) -- T
