On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:41:07 +0100, Baz Walter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14/08/10 16:29, Phil Thompson wrote: >> I may make it more restrictive (ie. more correct, but maybe at the cost >> of >> breaking code) by requiring bytes objects (for Python3) and str objects >> (for Python2), and no longer allowing str objects (for Python3) and >> unicode >> objects (for Python2). > > fwiw, this sounds fine to me - i have always done things that way as it > seems the most pythonic (EIBTI and all that). > > just to be clear, though: if you did this, it would still be possible to
> pass a bytearray to the scintilla apis that /retrieve/ text, right? Can you give me a specific example? Phil _______________________________________________ QScintilla mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/qscintilla
