On 21 Oct 2015, at 3:59 p.m., Dr. Sam Aaron <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 21 Oct 2015, at 15:57, Phil Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry, the underlying Scintilla code just doesn't support this.
> 
> Aargh :-(
> 
> So is this a definite no, or is there potentially any path which may enable 
> transparency in the future we could pursue?

You could fix the Scintilla code and submit the patches upstream.

Phil
_______________________________________________
QScintilla mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/qscintilla

Reply via email to