Apologies for not setting a subject on my last mail :)

On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:22:33 -0400, Justin Armstrong
<qtcompone...@badpint.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Its great to see the first technology preview of Qt Quick Components for
> Symbian!  
> Here are a few thoughts on the UI from a random member of the public :)
> 
> My overall impression is that these widgets aren't really like anything 
> in Symbian^3 at all.  They look quite similar to the widgets from the 
> Meego Touch Framework.
>   
> Some of the changes worry me a little, because there are parts of the
> Symbian^3 UX which are attractive and work well,
> and it would be a shame to lose them.
> To me it seems that one of the main problems with Symbian usability
> is a lack of consistency between applications. If Qt Components
> apps behave radically differently to other Symbian apps this isn't 
> going to help
> 
> My comments below come mainly from playing with the qmlgallery
> application.
> 
> 
> * Transitions
> The transition speed of dialogs and menus seems to be set far too long. 
> The fading and sliding effects should be subtle and not feel like they
> are slowing me down.
> 
> The dialogs slowly fade into view, which doesn't look as good as the
> sliding or > zooming/popping animation that you get when a native 
> Symbian^3 query dialog opens.
> 
> I like the way checkboxes animate when clicked (the checkboxes
> themselves seem a little small on the N8 screen though).
> Perhaps radio buttons  could have a similar animation.
> 
> I think having the button label text "wobble" when released is a bit
> weird :)
> 
> 
> * Dialog boxes
> Personally, I think that native Symbian^3 query dialogs are one of the
> more visually appealing parts of its UI. 
> 
> The dialogs in qmlgallery look rather disappointing in comparison. They
> are small and cramped and some of the text doesn't have proper margins.
> 
> I would prefer if Dialog and QueryDialog were anchored at
> the bottom of the screen, and the buttons looked like soft-keys.  I
> don't see any advantage in them being centered and it makes things 
> behave needlessly differently to native Symbian apps.
> 
> 
> * Menus
> I prefer the appearance of the native S^3 menus.  I think this is
> because of the bigger fonts and nice use of gradients.
> 
> 
> * ContextMenu
> Is ContextMenu meant to appear anchored above another component?
> It isn't in qmlgallery, and just looks like a SelectionDialog
> without a title.
> I don't think these should be the full width of the screen, but just big
> enough to fit the contents, like the context menu on 
> the Symbian^3 homescreen.
> 
> 
> * Softkeys
> Are softkey menus dead?  It looks like they have been replaced with one
> menu and a back button. 
> This probably makes sense.  Having a consistent place for a
> back button is one of the things I like most about the Maemo5 interface.
> 
> 
> * SectionScroller
> I don't think this is working properly in qmlgallery.
> 
> 
> * Haptic feedback
> Will this be coming to QtComponents?  This is another highlight of
> the S^3 interface, so I hope it will be available to
> QtComponents apps.
> 
> 
> Thanks for reading!
> 
> Justin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-components mailing list
> Qt-components@qt.nokia.com
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-components
_______________________________________________
Qt-components mailing list
Qt-components@qt.nokia.com
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-components

Reply via email to