On Sonntag 27 Mai 2012, André Pönitz wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 06:14:26AM +0200, Geronimo Ma. Hernandez wrote: > > The biggest point - no variable has an content in debugging session. Bug > > or misconfiguration? > > Please attach the debugger log (contents of the right pane of > Windows->Views ->Debugger Log) of such a "failed" session.
I'm sorry, but I continued with my project and currently I can't build it with QtCreator. That's probably my fault, cause I don't know cmake configuration ... ... but I don't really want to spent time bothering with different make systems. With netbeans I can enter any compiler-switch necessary to build the project. I'm no C++ developer - I come from java-world and need to do little jobs with C++ - so I don't like to spent lots of time to learn about build tools, I only use for a very short time. Before I tried QtCreator, I heard rumors about QtCreator having the best debugging interface ... so most probably my expectations where wrong. The point is - my first thought was - I did something wrong, so I tried to debug several executables. Let me compare it with kdevelop, which shows any accessible content from the same executable. With QtCreator the locals where shown by name, but when I click at the "+" in front of a composed type, nothing happens except the + changed with a - > > - I read about hacking QtCreator to get some var contents ... > > Where did you read what? Well, I searched several forum threads and finally hit this page: http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qtcreator-2.4/creator-debugging-helpers.html I only skimmed the page, but I said: No, not at all. I don't wonna spent my time on such items. > If it doesn't work for you, then the appropriate reaction > would be sending a mail to the mailing stating your version of Creator > what OS and which toolchain you are using. Ok, I fetched the 2.5.0 binary (revision eadad258b9) from http://qt.nokia.com/downloads/qt-creator-binary-for-linux-x11-64-bit and checked the system requirements. Installation completed without error, so I expected everything to be ok. I'm working at debian stable with kde-desktop and gnu / cmake toolchain. I don't know much about toolchains, that's why I need an IDE. > > At least if you'd like to be taken for serious. > > This goes both ways... Ok sorry - I found the above article that incredible, that I got emotional. But after all - you can take for granted: If I did not appreciate the state and the work of QtCreator, I would have written nothing. kind regards Gero _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
