Hello, Hey that's fine, no problem. Anyway since people are coming back, we may now be able to converge on something good! Can't wait for 2.6 ;-) !
Best regards, -- Francois On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Leandro T. C. Melo <[email protected]>wrote: > On 05/30/2012 06:53 PM, ext Typz wrote: > > Hello, > > Btw, anybody care to review the patch? It was almost merged (actually, > merged then reverted, see https://codereview.qt-project.org/21860), fixed > about two month ago, and not much has happened since then... > > It adds highlighting of all function/methods, as well as code warning > for mismatch in number of arguments. Virtual methods can still be > highlighted in a different style. It really improves the experience, and > makes reading code so much easier IMHO. > > > > Hi Francois, > > I just reviewed your patch. It's indeed a nice feature, but I left a > couple of comments. > > Since you mentioned the timing issue, it's admittedly longer then usual. > Sorry for that. Unfortunately most of the people that constantly work on > C++/editor are/were on relatively long leaves (including me). So I kindly > ask for some patience. Things should speed up a bit soon. > > > Kind regards, > Leandro > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > >
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
