On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Cristian Tibirna <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello > > I know what follows carries heavy flamewar potential and PLEASE don't let > yourself drawn into it. It is not at all my intention. > > My question: if I commit additions to code style configuration dialogs to > allow for changing the politics of relation between type and modifier in > method signatures, will they be accepted? > > What I would add is (configurable) possibility of formatting (when generating > class files of adding method definitions) this style > > void foo::bar(int& baz); > > as opposed to the default > > void foo::bar(int &baz); > > Thanks for advising. > > -- > Cristian Tibirna > KDE developer .. [email protected] .. http://www.kde.org > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
I can't speak for the opinions of the developers, but I would personally find such a feature quite useful. Different projects have different coding standards, so it would be nice to have something like this configurable on a per project basis. _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
