On 07/09/2013 01:05 PM, Koehne Kai wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:qt- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Christian Kandeler >> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:00 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] Use of namespaces in Qt Creator's own code >> >> On 07/09/2013 11:11 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >>> to solve the clash problem, there are two approaches: >>> - use an additional convention (ugly) >>> - FooNames::Foo >>> - Foo::FooClass >>> - remove the redundancy >>> - Foo::Plugin >> >> Definitely the latter. In general, I've come to resent this "double >> namespacing" >> that we do in a lot of places in Qt Creator (I am very much guilty of it >> too). It's >> probably a combination of mistrusting the C++ language and excessive use of >> using directives. How about discouraging that for new plugins in the coding >> conventions? > > ... only if the locator learns about namespaces, too.
Nice incentive, isn't it? Christian _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
