It's an appealing idea, but what happens when a non-trivial getter or setter is needed?
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Jason H <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be possible to have in addition to the Q_PROPERTY completion > template, to add the member, and getter, and setter in the class? > > > Q_PROPERTY(int emitRate READ emitRate WRITE setEmitRate) > > (in private section) > \t#t m_#s; > > (in public section) > \t#t #s(); //getter > \t#t set#S(#t #s); //setter > > > (in cpp file) > #t #c::#s(){ //getter > \treturn m_#s; > } > #t #c::set#S(#t #s){ //setter > \tm_#s = #s; > } > > where\t = tab, #s= the property name (emitRate), #S is a cap version > (EmitRate), and #c is the class name > > It's save me a bunch of time setting up trivial properties! > PS. I used # instead of percent-sign because that tripped a yahoo account > hack filter and I had to reset my password and everything. I guess spammers > don't test their printfs. LOL > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > >
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
