Hi,
I don't really see why you would want to do something like that. Headers are a feature, not a bug. I don't think many people would regard that as an "elevation". Regards, VK On 2014-03-04 01:17, Jason H wrote: > So Qt comes along and helps kick C++ into the modern era. I was wondering if > we could use Qt Creator to address one of my remaining complaints of C++. > > I really like languages like Python, C#, and Java where there is only an > implementation file. While we can't get rid of headers, it would be cool if > we could define a class file that gets split by QtCreator or qmake that would > prepare the .h and .cpp files from a unified file. > > Creator helps with the maintaining the header and the C with the light bulb, > but this isn't as elegant as having one file that controls both. I'm > wondering if its possible and f clang would be any help in reaching this new > level of elevating C++? > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator [1] Links: ------ [1] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
