Em , Tobias Hunger escreveu:
> On Oct 5, 2014 1:40 PM, "Diego Iastrubni" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 1) JNI = pain >> 2) Command line - means it will be easier for you to test and reproduce. >> 3) Using an external command also means the build dependencies of QtCreator >> will be smaller. > > That is actually a very good point, if you will want to contribute your > plugin at some point. > > I do not see us adding a dependency on Java for a pretty obscure versioning > system. > > If you do want to keep your plugin separate, then that is if course not an > issue. > > Best Regards, > Tobias My idea is contribute. This is really a big point. I was "fighting" with my .pro file to make compilation easy on others machines. The dependency on Java is really bad. I decided not to use JNI.
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
