On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Tobias Hunger <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jan 29, 2015 6:57 AM, "Alexander Drozdov" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, inital one. But this was discarded because "unneeded" files is > displayed in project tree, but it is useful for me. Also I totally have not > time to process it and integrate to upstream (like my patch for Perforce > plugin, it freezes in gerrit :-) and now I have no access to perforce VCS > at all). Also, outside of upstream I can integrate any solutions that looks > useful for me. So, I simple sync codebase approximately once a month or two > and time to time implement new features. > > A pending patch for perforce? Am I in the reviewer list? It yes, then I am > sorry for letting this fall through the crack. > > Best Regards, > Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > He refers to this patch <https://codereview.qt-project.org/67278>, which was abandoned after a long period of inactivity. You did review it :) - Orgad
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
