16.01.2016, 13:45, "Peter Kümmel" <[email protected]>: > Am 15.01.2016 um 15:46 schrieb Hunger Tobias: >> In essence Qt Creator will be GPL (with exception) from here on out. This >> effects the master branch of the Qt Creator repository. The stable branches >> are >> not going to get updated to the new licensing scheme. > > Strange; change from LGPL to GPL without any discussions.
Peter, If you read contributor agreement carefully, in 3.1 you grant non-exlusive rights to the code you've contributed to The Qt Company "under license terms of The Qt Company's choosing including any Open Source Software license". > > Is this again the idea, "if we don't GPL our code someone else earns MY > money" misbelief? > >> Please take a bit of time and check whether the patches change the >> copyright in >> unintended ways, especially if you have contributed code to Qt Creator. I >> think >> I managed to keep all information in the headers intact, but please help to >> make >> sure. Checking and double-checking all this information is tedious work and >> I >> might have done some unintended changes. >> >> Please also check your license template: Please use the one we ship with Qt >> Creator in dist/copyright_template.txt (after adapting the copyright >> information >> of course)! This file is already updated in git (master branch). >> >> The first patch of the set is here: >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/146218/ >> >> Please help reviewing the patches! >> >> The commercial plugins that are effected by the agreement are currently >> getting >> a similar license update and will get merged into the master branch once >> that is >> complete. >> >> Best Regards, >> Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
