Hi, David and Everyone.

> there is already a suggestion for this feature at
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-3111
Thanks for pointing out. I voted.
By I wonder how votes influence things. May be there is like decision what for 
every 20 votes we increse priority 1 level? No?

May be someone know how in JIRA get list of most wanted/voted bugs?



> Vote on this suggestions if you would like to see it at some point in 
> creator, but to
> be honest it hasn't currently the highest priority.
:( I see

Does  only me feel that all fields outside of code-editor are like from old 
90's ...
we are used to edit and search names in one way and outside of code-editor all 
line-edit-boxes are like
not for C++ devs ... they are like for word-editors

*I mean that ctrl-left and ctrl-right does not respect uppercase "midle-points" 
(like is skips
whole "setPlaintText" which is not the way it is in editor). Test this in 
search fields, renaming refactorings ... everythere!

*Line-edit-boxes font is small (not the one you have selected for code editor) 
... and I never found how font size of them can be increased.

*And search in locator and search in code is also unaware that it is possible 
to search with middle-point letters.

May be someone can point out other code-editor and code-completion features 
missed from line-edit-boxes all over QtC UI.


So I am not clear why this whole situation is not important (P3 for bug 3111).
It seems that if to subclass once from QLineEdit and add features we have in 
code-editor this can benefit ALL edit-boxes of QtC.


I welcome everyone share thoughts about look and feel of QtC line-edit-boxes of 
is vs to code-editor look and feel.

_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

Reply via email to