Hello, If I understand well the situation you describe, you are wrong, it is feasible and it is done: As you can see in the attachment (which is the dependency tree of Qt Creator 4.7.0 generated with https://github.com/pasccom/qtcreator-deptree), the situation arises with e.g. : -plugin0=QmlJS -plugin1=ExtensionSystem -plugin2=CPlusPlus -plugin3=Utils. I think, even though I did not check the code, that it prevents situation where we have a circular dependency (A depends on B depends on C depends on A). Best regards, Pascal COMBES
Le 23/09/2018 à 16:13, Szyk Cech a écrit : > Hi all! > > I study carefully Qt Creator plugin system. I just read > PluginManagerPrivate::loadQueue functions and thought about it for a > while and my question arise: > > Is it true: > > PluginManagerPrivate::loadQueue can return false (mean fail) if we > have 2 (or more) plugins which depend on other plugin simultaneously? > > In e.g.: > > I have plugin0 which depend on plugins plugin1 and plugin2 and these > two both based on plugin3. Then PluginManagerPrivate::loadQueue fail > and report circulation dependencies? > > Why is this wrong - I think it should be possible load such plugins > (plugin1 and plugin2 after 3 and then load plugin0). Is this not > fesible?!? > > Or maybe I am wrong and this is not the case... > > best regards > > Szyk Cech > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator >
deps-4.7.0.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
