Someone already posted compiler explorer, which is pretty amazing. I've used it before.
But I wanted to ask about REPL? (https://repl.it/languages/) It supports C++, but not Qt (as far as I know, and even if it did, it would be limited) A REPL mode would be great for developing minimal example/test cases. > Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 6:12 AM > From: "Jeandet Alexis" <alexis.jean...@lpp.polytechnique.fr> > To: qt-creator <qt-creator@qt-project.org> > Subject: [Qt-creator] Quick test or scratch-pad mode in qtc? > > Hello, > > I was wondering if this would be totally stupid to have a mode in QTC > were we could code in a single source with no Build System setup? > I always go to websites like coliru, godbolt, wandbox,... to do some > tests(test concepts, see if I can template something,...) because this > is so convenient to just start writing code without any setup. But this > has many drawbacks like, no or almost no completion, no debug and needs > internet. > > In QTC I would easily see a section in welcome page "scratch-pad" with > previous ones and a button to create a new one. I don't think we should > care about file location or any setup, source files could be stored in > QTC user data folder. Maybe we could just switch among available > compilers and set manually compile args like godbolt. > > Am I the only one who miss this feature? > If no I will definitely open a BR. > > Best regards and happy holidays, > Alexis. > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qt-creator > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qt-creator
