On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:04:53AM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > Andre, > 1) I hope you take my inpunt just as a constructive opinion > even when it might "somehow" criticize some part of qt-creator design... > bottom line I love qt-creator...
So far I had a hard time to interpret it that way. If your goal would have been this extra path option in the "Attach to remote" dialog a short "Would be nice to have"-style report on bugreports.qt.nokia.com could have saved a lot of time, on both sides. It's not that features don't get implemented when people actually want to use them. > 2) I'm not a Microsoft lover at all, but there are things on its IDE > that are well designed, even if they are "made in Microsoft". I think > their "session" approach is more confortable than creator's one Pat VS "solutions" are not equivalent to a Creator "session" if that's what you are trying to say. It's closer to a "subdirs project" in qmake terms. A "session" in a Creator context is _defined_ as "information that is interesting to the user, but not for the project". Andre' _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
