On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > hi diego, > > thanks for your effort! > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 05:17:27PM -0400, Diego Schulz wrote: >> Would you care to check out if the attached patch can be checked in? I >> mean, if it's usable. >> > technically it looks just fine. > though i think you'll need to make a merge request on gitorious for > legal reasons. or you sign an old-style copyright assignment ...
Ok, as this is the first time I'm using Git for something useful, just wanted to see if I'm on the rails and following a minimally correct workflow. I'm going to create a personal qt-creator_es clone and see if I can get an usable Qt 4.6 environment. > in the .pro file i prefer the languages to be sorted alphabetically. > i won't apply it until you are done, as half-done translations look > kinda unprofessional. :) > >> If it's not, the ts file is attached also. >> >> Currently it is not possible for me to run Qt 4.6, so I can't get an >> updated .ts by running make ts. Is there another way I can get an >> updated ts file once a day, at least? >> > none i know ... the .ts file diffs are rather huge, so i try to avoid > gratuitous commits. It's ok, fully understand. Thank you for taking the time for responding. diego _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
