On Monday 29 June 2009 11:55:46 Daniel Teske wrote: > On Monday 29 June 2009 11:37:42 ext Nico Kruber wrote: > > as part of my qt-creator-git rpm package (available for openSUSE (10.3- > > Factory), SLE (10-11) and Fedora 11) I integrated such a fix which I > > extracted from my patch and attached to this email > > -> this should solve the problem > > Someone should include that upstream, I think... > > We can't. Different distributions have different schemes for library > locations. In 1.1 we did something very similar to the patch, and hardcoded > lib64 for linux 64bit. > > Now for 1.2 the preferred way to put the libraries in lib64 is to run qmake > like this: > "qmake -r IDE_LIBRARY_BASENAME=lib64". > > That should work, though I haven't tested it.
Just saw that the "official" openSUSE packages in the BuildService use it that
way, too (and it works).
This way however is not that consistent since in qtcreatorwidgets.pro you use
linux-*64 {
QTC_LIBS=$$QTC_LIBS/lib64/qtcreator
} else {
QTC_LIBS=$$QTC_LIBS/lib/qtcreator
}
(this is actually where I borrowed my patch from)
Nico
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
