We'll still be here when you come back :) On 21 Jan 2010, at 22:09, Coda Highland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ken Ray <[email protected]> wrote: >> I tried qt-interest and not much of a response. Note that this test app I'm >> trying to build is just like the fontsampler demo that comes with >> creator/QT. I'm trying to duplicate the dockwidget on the left. How did >> fontsampler get around this problem ? It seems to me that if Creator can't >> hold a layout for more than a few clicks there is a serious flaw. It makes >> working with all the contents related to that dockwidget a pain in the ass. >> >> I'm going to go play with Mono now to see how there stuff is . >> >> I want some cross platform development that is stable. but if none is stable >> , then I guess it's back to VS .net .. > > Mono is pretty gimped, sadly. Most of the "good" .NET stuff is > Microsoft-only junk that's only available on Windows. Even Java would > be preferable to .NET if you want cross-platform compatibility. > > You happened to hit on the one thing I don't like about Qt: dock > widgets. I've never had a lot of luck with them, and when I do use > them I develop with code, not Designer. There's several things that > they don't do quite right. But don't let that one widget turn you off > to the toolkit as a whole. Qt's very stable and very robust, and it's > the best toolkit available for writing apps that look native on all > supported platforms. > > Consider possibly using some other solution if dock widgets in > Designer aren't working for you. Maybe construct the dock widgets in > code, or maybe use some non-docking solution. > > /s/ Adam > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
