On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:59:03 John Vilburn wrote: > I don't care much about the guard name, so if Qt Creator had a way to fix > that in the header I would be happy with whatever format Qt used. It is > fine to leave the renaming of files and the changing of guard names and > #include references as an option that can be turned off for those people > who like to do more work manually. But it is an essential option. Anything > that can be automated, should be.
And what about renaming all usages of the class? And don't forget about keeping indents (not only in source files, but also a pro-file, Makefile, CMakeLists.txt). I just want to say I don't mind this feature, but I don't think it's essential. Also I want to say that renaming a class name is not good at all. -----|- Gena. _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
