People,

calm down a little. I myself felt somewhat attacked by Danny's mail ... the 
problem at hand has been discussed at great length already on this list, and 
his mail did seem to have no other purpose than ranting. Yes, qmake is 
under-documented. Yes, .pro.user & session files cannot really be shared, which 
some of us would like to do. But we (as the core developers) have other things 
on the plate too, and in fact things that have a higher priority. That's life. 
But I'm with Daniel in the regard that bringing this up again and again, and in 
the form of a rant, doesn't help anyone.

Kai Koehne

Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion, and is NOT necessarily the opinion of 
Nokia as a company. ;)
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of ext Robert Caldecott [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] Qt Creator and generic projects

Is this the official Nokia response Daniel?  Because Danny Price is
correct - the current session scheme/.user files is *useless* in a
team environment.  The only way to make projects work that contain
multiple libs and build steps is to hack the .pro file, a mechanism
that is both poorly documented and poorly understood.  I tell my team
to avoid the Project tab because the settings within cannot be shared
- a serious problem for us developers trying to get a job done.

As a real-world user of your product I am shocked and saddened by your
aggressive response.  You should listen to our complaints instead of
dismissing them as 'wrong' and 'stupid'.

I'd go as far to say that I think you owe Danny an apology.

On 12 March 2010 08:25, Daniel Teske <[email protected]> wrote:
>> <rant>About qmake</rant>
>
> Did you even read the original mail? That asked a question about qmake.
> Instead you are spreading again your misinformed wrong and stupid viewpoint.
> Please stop that immediately.
>
> daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

_______________________________________________
Qt-creator mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

Reply via email to