On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:16:05AM +0900, paulo wrote: > Hello, > > I don't want to disturb your discussion, specially since I never red > either code, but isn't it a fact that vim does its syntax highlight > using post compilation loaded files.
There's a difference between syntax highlighting coming out of a couple of regular expressions and syntax highlighting coming out of a C++ parser. > Is there a justification to hardcoding anything at all? vim.cpp hardcodes things as well: syn keyword cppStatement new delete this friend using syn keyword cppAccess public protected private syn keyword cppType inline virtual explicit export bool wchar_t etc. > Isn't vim performance actually better than the average with the extra > fame and fortune of having one of the widest language support in the > market? (AFAIK) > > How does that approach compares with qtc? It does something completely different, even if it looks pretty similar in most cases. Andre' _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
